Cases 1 - 10 of 166
Epps v. Zeigler et al
as 1:2020cv00522
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, Warden Walter West and Officer Whitington
Plaintiff:
Antoine Epps
Interested Party:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tetlow v. Hogan et al
as 8:2019cv00356
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, Stephen Moyer, Pat Goines-Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Lynn Tetlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tarpley v. Zeigler et al
as 1:2017cv03455
Plaintiff:
Steven Tarpley
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, David Sipes, Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarpley v. Zeigler et al
as 1:2017cv02961
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Tarpley
Defendant:
J. Michael Zeigler, David Sipes, Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridgeford v. DPSCS ADA Coordinator et al
as 8:2017cv02480
Plaintiff:
Douglass Bridgeford
Defendant:
DPSCS ADA Coordinator, Sec. of State Moyer and Dupty Sec J. Michael Ziegler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Artis v. Wolford et al
as 1:2017cv02409
Plaintiff:
John Earl Artis
Defendant:
Jermey W. Wolford, James A. Strope, Frank B. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03235
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turner v. Shearin et al
as 1:2016cv03006
Defendant:
Bobby P. Shearin, Frank B. Bishop, D. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Douglas Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2016cv02729
Plaintiff:
Phillip Alvin Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, J. Michael Stouffer and Warden Armstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorensen v. Doe et al
as 8:2015cv01198
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sorensen
Defendant:
John Doe, John Hammond, John Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
