Cases 1 - 10 of 11,480
Bonilla v. Wilkens et al
as 4:2024cv03563
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Claudia Wilkens, Judge Jeffrey S. White, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03552
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Carroll v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County et al
as 3:2024cv03565
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Latrice Carroll
Defendant:
Superior Court of Contra Costa County, Jennifer L. Velarde, Sarah Bluestone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) DePonte v. Stohl et al
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Stohl, Stern, J Saucedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Alva v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
James Scott Alva
Defendant:
State of California, Warden, J. Rey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arguello v. John Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Israel Arguello
Defendant:
John Doe and J. Agredano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mario A. Haney v. Warden et al
as 5:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Haney
Defendant:
Warden, J. Salcedo, Captain M. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Booth v. Pouge
as 1:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Booth v. Pouge
as 2:2024cv01629
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
