Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jones v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv01841
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Mr J Clark, Mr D Skeggs, Mr M Gruver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gruver et al
as 3:2023cv01731
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
M Gruver and J Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Gruver et al
as 3:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Mr J Clark, Ms J Rodriguez, Mr R Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gruver et al
as 3:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Gruver, J Clark, Skeggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Jones et al
as 6:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Marcus Scott and Marcus Scott Bey
Defendant:
Unknown Jones, Albert Arnold, Sgt Larry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2023cv01474
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Mr M Gruver, Mr J Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madron v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Michael Don Madron
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bryan Collier, UTMB Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Class v. Davis et al
as 4:2020cv03440
Defendant:
Lisa M. Nichols, TDCJ Director Lori Davis, Kimberly Klock and others
Plaintiff:
Luis E. Class
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Mackey et al
as 5:2020cv00407
Defendant:
D'Ann Richards, Hector Ruiz, Deborah Jasso and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. King et al
as 2:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Marks Shelton
Defendant:
Timothy A King, H Gratz, Erion J Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
