Cases 1 - 10 of 255
JONES v. OLIVER et al
as 7:2024cv00097
Defendant:
WARDEN RALPH SHROPSHIRE, WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, DEPUTY WARDEN VERONICA STEWART and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN L JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLEMENTS v. BEASLEY
as 5:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD CLEMENTS, JR
Respondent:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Wilson et al
as 6:2024cv00049
Defendant:
Mr. Wilson, Commissioner Tyrone Oliver, Lieutenant Haley Dean and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Reeves, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Beasley et al
as 6:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jackson
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley and Sgt. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILLSMAN v. MOORE et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Defendant:
JUDGE J R BAILEY, MICHAEL MOORE and JANNA JACOB
Plaintiff:
RAKEIM JAQUIN HILLSMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Beasley et al
as 6:2024cv00038
Defendant:
Sgt. Wilson and Warden Jacob Beasley
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02687
Respondent:
Otis Stanton, Brian Dennis Adams, Justin Jones and others
Petitioner:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Bragg v. United States Of America
as 4:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Jacob Bragg
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Beasley et al
as 6:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Dennis Long
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, DW McFarland, Lt. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
