Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Douglas v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv02322
Plaintiff: Abraham Jacob Douglas
Defendant: Warden Weber, Asst Warden B. Butler and Correctional Officer M. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidwell III v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv01750
Plaintiff: John Anthony Kidwell III
Defendant: Thomas Lee, Richard Clayton, Tyler Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Kelson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01227
Plaintiff: Kenneth Alonzo Jacobs
Defendant: John Kelson, Thomas Laue, Ofc. Wilkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Copez v. Bowman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00984
Plaintiff: Marquis C. Copez
Defendant: David Bowman, Sgt Jacob Northcraft, Sgt Leon Goodrich and others
Interested Party: Maryland Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Bohrer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00357
Respondent: William Bohrer
Petitioner: Russell Kurt Jacobs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowling v. USA - 2255
as 1:2019cv03130
Petitioner: Jacob Bowling
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02128
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01648
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bowling v. Speight
as 8:2018cv01289
Plaintiff: Jacob M. Bowling
Defendant: Speight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00219
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?