Cases 1 - 10 of 280
Davis v. Warren et al
as 6:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Daryl L. Davis
Defendant:
Don Warren, Shirley McKellar, Deborah Pullum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Cueto
as 5:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Cooper
Defendant:
Warden Emundo Cueto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Wilson et al
as 4:2024cv00326
Petitioner:
Ronnie Turner
Respondent:
Sharon Wilson, Richard Bland, Andrea Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Rigsby
as 4:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Bobby Rigsby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Scott et al
as 6:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Mark Charles Bailey
Defendant:
FNU Scott, FNU Parker, Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Brumley et al
as 4:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Caleb Brumley, Anothony Newton and Bobby D Rigsby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Newton et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Anthony J. Newton, Bobby D. Rigsby and Caleb Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bailey
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Donald Trump, Ms. FNU Harmon/Washburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penton v. Norman et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jacob Cory Penton
Defendant:
Jerrad Norman, FNU LNU 5:24-CV-005 (1), FNU LNU 5:24-CV-005 (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
