Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Woodraska v. Young et al
as 4:2021cv04120
Plaintiff:
Richard James Woodraska
Defendant:
Darin Young, Mike Leidholt, Jeremy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vosberg v. Lt. Kotalik et al
as 4:2021cv04094
Defendant:
Matt Trenhaile, Lt. Kotalik, Mary Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lynn Vosberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fassett v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv04038
Plaintiff:
Kyle Eugene Fassett
Defendant:
Brad Lewandoski, Jeremy Ortman, Valerie McGovern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kling v. Louie et al
as 4:2018cv04027
Plaintiff:
Kary Gene Kling
Defendant:
Ed Louie, Robert Dooley, Jeremy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv03011
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Wright
Defendant:
United States of America, Oscar Rameriz, David Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauer v. Glaser et al
as 4:2016cv04055
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bauer
Defendant:
Jacob Glaser, Brandon Knutson, Darin Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bauer v. Dooley
as 5:2015cv05089
Petitioner:
Jeremy Bauer
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Klaudt v. South Dakota Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv04172
Plaintiff:
Ted Alvin Klaudt
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections, Robert Dooley, Lee Kaufenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale et al v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2015cv04103
Plaintiff:
James Irving Dale, Brian Michael Holzer, Michael Eugene Koch and others
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Joshua Klimek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Dooley et al
as 4:2015cv04053
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Moran
Defendant:
Robert Dooley, Jenifer Stanwick, Lee Kaufenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
