Cases 1 - 10 of 399
Denelsbeck v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
John Denelsbeck, III
Defendant:
Ricardo Ramirez, Jeremy J. Delacruz and Daniel Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Wellpath
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Burnett
Defendant:
Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wickman v. The State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01494
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wickman
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Unknown Defendant 7:24-cv-90-O
as 7:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant 7:24-cv-90-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wickman v. Navarro County Jail
as 3:2024cv01326
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wickman
Defendant:
Navarro County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. USA
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jeremy Damon Ross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Johnston et al
as 7:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jace Smith
Defendant:
Captain Holly Johnston, Captain Daryl Bonnin, Sheriff Sydney Kirk Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Fort Worth Medical Center et al
as 3:2024cv00750
Petitioner:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Respondent:
Fort Worth Medical Center, P Velda Bellah, Jeremy Noel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hedrick v. University of Texas Medical Branch et al
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jesse Alan Hedrick
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Robert Darling, Jeremy Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
