Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Randy Baadhio v. Brian Hofacker, et al
as 17-2749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HOFACKER, Detective, MTPD, SEAN SULLIVAN, Police Officer, MTPD, ROBERT PALMER, Chief of Police and others
Randy Baadhio v. Brian Hofacker, et al
as 17-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HOFACKER, Detective MTPD, SEAN SULLIVAN, Police Officer, MTPD, ROBERT PALMER, Chief of Police, MTPD and others
Franklin Nicoloudakis v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 16-3372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN NICOLOUDAKIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., Prosecutor, et al and ROBERT E. MCDONALD
Tormu Prall v. Supreme Court, et al
as 13-2313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 13-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 12-1760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
PRALL v. SUPREME COURT et al
as 3:2011cv07004
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRALL v. SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2011cv07004
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AYOUB v. BOCCHINI et al
as 3:2011cv07100
Plaintiff:
SAMIR AYOUB
Defendant:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR. and MICHELLE S. GASPARIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tormu Prall v. Joseph Bocchini, Jr., et al
as 11-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
