Cases 1 - 10 of 49
GILLIAM v. FLOWERS et al
as 1:2023cv02748
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. GILLIAM
Defendant:
BRYANT FLOWERS, KATHERINE CONSTANTINE-BLINN, JACK MANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILLIAM v. CAVALLARO et al
as 1:2021cv16844
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. GILLIAM
Defendant:
STEPHEN E. CAVALLARO, NICHOLAS J. RUSSO, JACK MANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEMUSA v. KIRSCH et al
as 2:2019cv20746
Defendant:
HON. ROBERT KIRSCH and JACK M. SABATINO
Plaintiff:
JAMUGA M. WEMUSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISOM v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv19601
Plaintiff:
MARTESS ISOM and Gary Hodges
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SARGEANT'S ROBERTS, JACK ISABELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTLEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06920
Plaintiff:
JACK R. BARTLEY
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POLO v. ORTIZ et al
as 2:2016cv05137
Petitioner:
JACK E. POLO
Respondent:
DAVID D. ORTIZ and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LESKI v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2016cv03125
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LESKI
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GARY LANIGAN, THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUNHAMMER v. MARKELL et al
as 3:2015cv06878
Plaintiff:
PAUL M. BRUNHAMMER
Defendant:
JACK A. MARKELL, PATRICIA WALTHER GRIFFIN, COL. NATHANIEL MCQUEEN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONILLA v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2015cv06795
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BONILLA
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY , RAYMOND LANIGAN , THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NERI v. PENNSAUKEN LIBRARY et al
as 1:2014cv06805
Plaintiff:
PHILIP NERI
Defendant:
PENNSAUKEN LIBRARY, PENNSAUKEN TOWNSHIP, ANTHONY DIMIMEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
