Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Thompson v. Douglas County Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Thompson, Sr.
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections, Michael Myers, Lt. Sanduski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Peterson et al
as 4:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
Brendan Welch
Defendant:
Jacob Peterson, Officer S. Wolf, Officer Hawken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00135
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garcia v. Coombs et al
as 4:2022cv03019
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Z. Garcia
Defendant:
David W. Coombs, Jr. and Jacob P. Betsworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob v. Cotton et al
as 8:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
David H. Jacob
Defendant:
Rosalyn Cotton, Mark T. Langan, Robert Twiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrahill v. Tecumseh State Correctional Institution et al
as 4:2021cv03022
Plaintiff:
Jacob Edward Harrahill
Defendant:
State of Nebraska and Tecumseh State Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob v. Cotton et al
as 4:2020cv03107
Defendant:
Virgil J. Patlan, Layne Gissler, Mark T. Langan and others
Plaintiff:
David H. Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staska et al v. Stecker et al
as 4:2018cv03119
Defendant:
Rhonda Andresen, John H. Sohl, Andrew Lange and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob F. Staska and Jodie M. Fallon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wistrom v. US Marshalls
as 8:2018cv00337
Respondent:
US Marshalls
Petitioner:
Jacob Raymond Wistrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jacob v. Cotton et al
as 8:2017cv00215
Defendant:
Teresa L. Bittinger, Rosalyn Cotton, Virgil J. Patlan and others
Plaintiff:
David H. Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
