Cases 1 - 10 of 41
William Harper v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 16-5858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CHARLES HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., Shelby County Mayor and JAMES E. COLEMAN, SCCC Director
Walton v. Shelby Co. Division of Correction Center et al
as 2:2014cv02660
Plaintiff:
William Walton
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Division of Correction Center, Connie Flets Raynor, James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Benson v. Shelby County Government, et al
as 14-5908
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and others
Ricky Benson v. Shelby County Government, et al
as 14-5897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and others
Ricky Benson v. Shelby County Government, et al
as 14-5876
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., JAMES E. COLEMAN and others
Ricky Benson v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 14-5875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON, aka Rickey Benson
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., Mayor, JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR., Director, TONYA BEASLEY, Grievance Supervisor and others
Benson v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2014cv02530
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Shelby County Government, Mark Luttrell, Jr., James E. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Hughes v. Correct Care Solutions, et al
as 14-5795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN ALAN HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, MEDICAL STAFF and JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR., SCCC Director
Ricky Benson v. Mark Luttrell, Jr., et al
as 14-5750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON, aka Rickey Benson
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK H. LUTTRELL, JR., Mayor, JAMES E. COLEMAN, JR., Director, TONYA BEASLEY, Grievance Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
