Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stern v. Epps et al
as 3:2011cv00319
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Margaret Bingham, Eddie Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Garcia et al
as 1:2011cv00147
Plaintiff:
James H. Smith
Defendant:
Joe Garcia, Van Giadrosich, Pearl River County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swans v. Epps et al
as 3:2011cv00172
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Swans
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Alva Taylor, Jammie Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stern v. Epps
as 3:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stern v. Epps
as 2:2010cv00258
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stern v. Hinds County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
Hinds County Circuit Court and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stern v. Hinds County Circuit Court
as 3:2009cv00628
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
Hinds County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stern v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2009cv00335
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stern v. Epps et al
as 2:2008cv00033
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Mississippi Department of Corrections, American Correctional Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stern v. Hinds County Detention Facility et al
as 3:2007cv00348
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
Hinds County Detention Facility, Malcolm McMillian and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
