Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Proctor, Jr. v. Warden of SCI-Houtzdale et al
as 3:2023cv01323
Petitioner:
James H. Proctor, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Houtzdale, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and District Attorney of Monroe County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENDYNA v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
JAMES H BENDYNA
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PROCTOR v. DIALESANDRO et al
as 2:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
James H. Proctor
Defendant:
MARK DIALESANDRO, John Stabiel, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Respondent:
Superintendent BARRY R. SMITH, JOHN E. WETZEL, COUNSELOR GINTER and others
Petitioner:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv01611
Defendant:
Giater, Dorina Varner, Derring and others
Plaintiff:
James H. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shrieves v. Penna. Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 5:2018cv04254
Petitioner:
James H, Shrieves
Respondent:
PENNA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shrieves v. Penna. Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2018cv01683
Petitioner:
James H, Shrieves
Respondent:
Penna. Board of Probation and Parole and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bendyna v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00860
Plaintiff:
James H. Bendyna, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, L. J. Oddo and D. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bendyna v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
James H. Bendyna, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, L.J. Oddo, D. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campbell v. Oddo
as 3:2016cv00524
Petitioner:
James H. Campbell
Respondent:
L. J. Oddo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
