Cases 1 - 10 of 10
James Chambers v. A-Avalon Corr Svc, Inc.
as 16-10104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES K. CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
L. SERRANO, Administrator
Chambers v. Ombudsman Office PREA Safe Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
James K Chambers
Defendant:
Ombudsman Office PREA Safe Prisons, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Parole Division TDCJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Chambers v. A-Avalon Corr Svc, Inc., et al
as 15-11113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES K. CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
A-AVALON CORRECTIONS SERVICES, INCORPORATED, SOUTHERN CORRECTIONS, INCORPORATED and L. SERRANO, Administrator
James Chambers v. Tarrant County, et al
as 15-10985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES K. CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
TARRANT COUNTY and TARRANT COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
Chambers v. Tarrant County et al
as 4:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
James K Chambers
Defendant:
Tarrant County and Tarrant County Hospital District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. TTUHSC Management Teams UTMB
as 3:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
James K Chambers
Defendant:
TTUHSC Management Teams UTMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James K. Chambers vs. Conmed Health Management, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00152
Plaintiff:
James K. Chambers
Defendant:
Conmed Health Managment Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. U.T.M.B. Managment Team
as 3:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
James K. Chambers
Defendant:
U.T.M.B. Managment Team
Consol_defendant:
Conmed Health Managment Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. U.T.M.B. Managment Team
as 5:2014cv00383
Plaintiff:
James K. Chambers
Defendant:
U.T.M.B. Managment Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James K. Chambers vs. Conmed Health Management, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00387
Plaintiff:
James K. Chambers
Defendant:
Conmed Health Managment Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
