Cases 1 - 10 of 36
James Lee Pinkerton v. James Engelman
as 2:2023cv06648
Petitioner:
James Lee Pinkerton
Respondent:
James Engelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Mathews v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
James Lee Mathews
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Jim Cooper, Yee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mathews v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
James Lee Mathews
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff and UC Davis Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulsey et al v. Mnuchin
as 4:2021cv02280
Plaintiff:
Michael Ethington, David A Norwood, Jonathon Zigrre and others
Defendant:
Steven Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Arendas v. Rollins et al
as 2:2020cv00061
Plaintiff:
Peter John Arendas
Defendant:
Candy Rollins and James Lee Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Arendas v. Vega et al
as 2:2019cv02577
Plaintiff:
Peter John Arendas
Defendant:
James Lee Lucas and Dustin Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Barton v. Clerk of U.S. District Court et al
as 2:2019cv06690
Plaintiff:
William Barton
Defendant:
Marteen James Miller, James Lee, Clerk of U.S. District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Barton v. Biddick et al
as 2:2019cv00465
Plaintiff:
William Barton
Defendant:
William Biddick, Jr. and James Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David E. Conrad et al v. John Doe No. 2 et al
as 5:2017cv00770
Plaintiff:
David E. Conrad, James Lee and Deonte Vondell Spicer
Defendant:
D. Degoey, D. Degoey, C. Herrera and others
James Lee Abbott Jr. v. Joe Lizarraga et al.
as 5:2016cv01517
Petitioner:
James Lee Abbott, Jr.
Respondent:
Joe Lizarraga and The State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
