Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Bagwell v. Oberly et al
as 1:2019cv00508
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Bagwell
Defendant:
William Chanler, Witsil, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir et al v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv00933
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir, Malachai DeBruce, Antonio R. Bailey and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Dana Metzger, Jane Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Noble v. Warden James T. Vaughn Correct, et al
as 16-1761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
DIANE C. STREET, M. JANE BRADY, ABIGAIL LAYTON and others
McLeod v. Brady et al.
as 1:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
Steven A. McLeod
Defendant:
M. Jane Brady, Sharon Agnew, Susan Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Noble v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00043
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Noble
Respondent:
David Pierce, Diane Streett, M. Jane Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Smith v. Robert Farley, et al
as 15-5189
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES PRESTON SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT L. FARLEY, Warden, TIM FAZENBAKER, Unit Manager, Big Sandy, FEDERAL P.O. OFFICER, Beckley, WV and others
Donohue v. Manetti et al
as 2:2015cv00636
Defendant:
Jane Brady, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Donohue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Farley et al
as 7:2014cv00102
Petitioner:
James Preston Smith
Respondent:
Robert L. Farley, T. Fazenbaker, Fed. P.O. Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ivan Mendez v. Matthew Dean, et al
as 14-1917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant:
MATTHEW DEAN, STEPHANIE ANN TSANTES, ELIZABETH R. MCFARLAN and others
Mendez v. Dean, et al.
as 1:2014cv00322
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
Matthew Dean, Stephanie Ann Tsantes, Elizabeth R. McFarlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
