Cases 1 - 10 of 680
Deloach v. Warden, Jenkins Correctional Facility
as 6:2024cv00044
Defendant:
Any or All John or Jane Doe Defendants and Tyrone Oliver
Plaintiff:
Kevin Avareze Deloach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINGFIELD v. ANDREWS et al
as 5:2024cv00234
Defendant:
JOSHUA ANDREWS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BERNARD WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMOS v. BOBBITT et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Defendant:
WARDEN TREVONZA BOBBITT, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE, WARDEN TOMMY BOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE AMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snell-Jones v. G.D.C. et al
as 6:2024cv00034
Defendant:
D.W. Thomas, Co. Ms. C., Buford and others
Plaintiff:
Zion Snell-Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L HAMILTON
Defendant:
VONTERIA SMITH, DEPUTY WARDEN NICHOLAS BROWN, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Evans Memorial Hospital et al
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Rodrekus Watson
Defendant:
Evans Memorial Hospital and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DECATUR COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
HAROLD UNYULA SMITH, SR
Defendant:
WARDEN GORDON SCREEN, JR, DECATUR COUNTY PRISON and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adan v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02432
Petitioner:
Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CLAYTON v. KELMON et al
as 5:2024cv00165
Defendant:
DEREK WILKES, JOHN DOE, LOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
