Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sumrall v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv05395
Plaintiff:
Ammon Ra Sumrall
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Timothy Ward, Alan Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobson v. NaphCare Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03632
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
Naph Care Inc., Medical Director at Fulton County Jail, John Does (I-III) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blocker v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv02619
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bernard Blocker
Defendant:
Doctor Jane Doe #2, Nurse John Doe, Health Care Personnel Signature Signature 0240 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton et al v. Price et al
as 1:2019cv00995
Plaintiff:
Stephen Collymore, Bendamin Harmon Saine, Earnest Barnard Clayton and others
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Jane Doe 1, Fulton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R. A. v. Niles et al
as 1:2014cv01870
Plaintiff:
R. A.
Defendant:
Avery Niles, L. Gale Buckner, Amy Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2013cv00464
Plaintiff:
Eddie Green and Treona Hemphill
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Erroll Davis, Jane Doe 2 and others
Smith v. Owens et al
as 3:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lester J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Donald Barrow, FNU Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
