Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Buckley et al v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Steven Buckley and Yolanda Almons
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway et al v. Hall, Commissioner et al
as 3:2019cv00798
Defendant:
ARP Director Richard Pennington, Pelicia Hall, Commissioner, Warden Unknown Banks and others
Plaintiff:
John & Jane Does 1-100, James Long, Jason Holloway and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Shaw et al
as 3:2019cv00370
Defendant:
Warden Frank Shaw, John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jason Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Marion County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-100, Marion County, Mississippi, Laura Stogner and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boddie v. Nash et al
as 3:2018cv00390
Plaintiff:
Willie Boddie
Defendant:
Cheron Nash and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan v. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) et al
as 5:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Nathan
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCain v. Burke et al
as 3:2011cv00635
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wayne McCain
Defendant:
James Burke, Tom Applegate, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soderstrom v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 2:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Soderstrom
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, L. Mayberry, B. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
