Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Coit (PS) v. Stencil et al
as 1:2023cv02835
Plaintiff:
Jill Coit
Defendant:
Andre Stencil, Jared Polis, Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Brooks (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Jason Brooks and Jason T Brooks
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Colorado State Board of Parole, Adrianne Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Reynolds, et al
as 23-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TERESA REYNOLDS, NATALIYA NICKELS, POWELL and others
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Johnson v. Smith, et al
as 22-1327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET SMITH, STEPHANIE DALTON, RICHARD HODGE and others
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01743
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Janet Smith, Stephanie Dalton, Richard Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Polis, et al
as 22-1174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L. R. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
JARED POLIS, Governor, State of Colorado, DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, JEFF LONG, Warden, Sterling Correcotional Facility and others
Johnson v. Dalton et al
as 1:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Stephanie Dalton, Kathleen Boyd, Richard Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dalton et al
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Stephanie Dalton, Kathleen Boyd, Richard Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
