Cases 1 - 10 of 105
DAVIS v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN TERRY E BARNARD, VICE CHAIRMAN DAVID HERRING, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Christopher Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. City of Tampa
as 1:2024cv02143
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
City of Tampa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 7:2023cv00134
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBERTS v. ROBERTS et al
as 5:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
CODY ROBERTS
Defendant:
JAY ROBERTS and BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MONTGOMERY STATE PRISON
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant:
Montgomery State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DAVIS v. MONTGOMERY STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. REED et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
AMANDA REED, DONALD CONEWAY, SR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Bobbitt et al
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Kevias Jackson
Defendant:
Warden Trevonza Bobbitt, Unit Manager Jawaka Johnson, Sergeant Ronnie Shuemake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
