Cases 1 - 10 of 461
Zapata v. Stefanski et al
as 1:2024cv03785
Plaintiff:
Luis F. Zapata
Defendant:
NYPD Officer Jeffrey Stefanski, NYPD Officer Christopher Bannon, NYPD Officer Simone Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaye v. McGunnes
as 1:2024cv02478
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Kaye
Defendant:
Thomas T. McGunnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Awuley v. Ball
as 6:2024cv06189
Petitioner:
Prince Awuley
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls and Michael Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Volcimus v. Uhler et al
as 9:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Volcimus
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Jay Skiff, A. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Footman v. Doherty et al
as 2:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Karon Footman
Defendant:
Dale Doherty, Jeffrey Foster, Errol D Toulon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zapata v. Stefanski et al
as 1:2024cv03154
Plaintiff:
Luis F. Zapata
Defendant:
NYPD Officer Jeffrey Stefanski, NYPD Officer Christopher Bannon, NYPD Officer Simone Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Routi v. Jacobs
as 2:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Routi
Defendant:
Judge Alanzo Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TerBorg v. Martuscello
as 6:2024cv06106
Petitioner:
Jeffrey TerBorg
Respondent:
D. Martuscello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
