Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Guan v. County of San Fracisco Magistrate Company et al
as 3:2024cv02896
Plaintiff:
Min Jian Guan
Defendant:
County of San Fracisco Magistrate Company and San Francisco County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Pangborn v. Strong et al
as 2:2023cv02976
Plaintiff:
David James Pangborn
Defendant:
Strong, Andrichuk, Jian Ma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Clark v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark
Defendant:
Jeffrey Macomber, Jeff Lynch, Joseph T. Zeiter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Lynch et al
as 2:2022cv02054
Plaintiff:
Bayard Devell Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, San Joaquin General Hospital, Diagnostic Radiological Imaging - Elk Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PC) Dawson v. Lynch et al
as 2:2021cv00510
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Meskath Uddin, Jian Ma and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Manwell Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ennis v. California State Prison - Sacramento et al
as 2:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Ennis
Defendant:
Aubert, A. Herrera, Pehhe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Thompson v. Baughman et al
as 2:2020cv00132
Defendant:
- Nicholson, Keith Myers, David Baughman and others
Plaintiff:
Romonte J. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason S. Harmon v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv00388
Defendant:
David Oberst, Dr. Bennie Carter, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Harmon and Jason S Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin Seanz Salcido v. R. C. Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv09259
Defendant:
L. Mason Hearn, CMD Staff Unknown Name, Dr. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Seanz Salcido
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
