Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cunningham v. Bossier City et al
as 5:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Jo Cunningham
Defendant:
City of Bossier City, Jail of Bossier City and Bossier City Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Simmons v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Edward Simmons
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, E. Brown, Unknown Verrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Malonsain, et al
as 2:2017cv03971
Plaintiff:
Leonard Perkins
Defendant:
Jon Jo Malonsian, William C. Credo, Gerry C. Ovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobgood v. McMorris et al
as 2:2016cv02519
Plaintiff:
Dustin Karl Hobgood
Defendant:
Angie McMorris, Jo Ann Saltformaggio, Jerry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Holmes et al
as 5:2015cv00141
Plaintiff:
Henry Earl Cunningham
Defendant:
Shalondrea Alise Holmes, Earlene M Thomas, John Marion Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Cook et al
as 2:2013cv04828
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davenport
Defendant:
Wayne Cook, Casey McVea, Bessie Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. St Martin et al
as 6:2010cv01788
Plaintiff:
Marcus D Steele
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept St Martin Parish, Waveson Guidry, Reginald Clues and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tunson v. Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00508
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jo Tunson
Defendant:
LA Dept of Corrections, Burl Cain, Nowell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tunson v. Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv00988
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jo Tunson
Defendant:
LA Dept of Corrections, Burl Cain, Nowell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
