Cases 1 - 9 of 9
VASQUEZ v. BERKS COUNTY et al
as 5:2020cv05116
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, JEFFREY SMITH, CHRISTIAN LEINBACH and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. POLLACK et al
as 5:2019cv05343
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, BERKS COUNTY, JAMES A. POLLACK and others
Plaintiff:
KALEY E. DAMORE, VINCENT J. SMITH and BAIL SHOP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. BERKS COUNTY, PA (TOWNSHIP) et al
as 5:2019cv01342
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC., WEST READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, FOX NEWS MEDIA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. FACEBOOK, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv01526
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC., WEST READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, FOX NEW & ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANDRON v. SMITH et al
as 5:2017cv04096
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LANDRON
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, JOHN E. WETZEL, JOHN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GANNAWAY v. GLUNT et al
as 5:2015cv04241
Petitioner:
SHAKUR C. GANNAWAY
Respondent:
STEVEN GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY, READING, JOHN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOTO v. PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2013cv04258
Petitioner:
HECTOR MANUEL SOTO, JR.
Respondent:
PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BRENDALEE TRITT, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto v. PA State Attorney General et al
as 1:2013cv01863
Petitioner:
Hector Manuel Soto, Jr.
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General, Brendalee Tritt, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GANNAWAY v. MARSH et al
as 5:2011cv04748
Petitioner:
SHAKUR D. GANNAWAY
Respondent:
ROBERT J. MARSH, JEFF A. HORTON, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
