Cases 1 - 10 of 531
Ross v. U.S. et al
as 3:2024cv00386
Defendant:
Day Springs Family Care, Steve Lowe, UT Medical Neurosurgeons Knoxville, TN and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis et al v. Hall et al
as 3:2024cv01120
Defendant:
John Does, Jane Does, Darin Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Buford R. Hollis and Jim George Conaser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01119
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Oswald M. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02585
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Detective John Doe and Shelby County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Durrell Jordan Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00898
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Officer "Gray" Skyler, Officers John Doe (2) and others
Plaintiff:
Willard William Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and Amber L. Phillips
Plaintiff:
Ashley M. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00885
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and Amber L. Phillips
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayles v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
James Gayles
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
William Ford
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and Amber Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Zervas et al
as 1:2024cv01152
Defendant:
FNU Cooley, FNU Donnovant, FNU Kemp and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
