Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Daniels v. Linder et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Daniels
Defendant:
D. Linder, John Robert Houston and E. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos, John Robert v. Trump
as 9:2024cv80169
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
O'CONNOR v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2021cv00113
Defendant:
SAMUEL ALITO, REDMOND BARNES, SCOTT HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
NYKA O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demos Jr. v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv22301
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos Jr., Meletiez Edic, Peter Gabe and others
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foche v. United States Of America
as 8:2020cv00737
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
John Robert Foche
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DEMOS v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv00020
Defendant:
US HOUSE, US CONGRESS, US SENATE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDowell v. Bowman et al
as 5:2018cv00337
Defendant:
C. Berentine, State of Florida, Department of Law Enforcement and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. United States Of America
as 2:2016cv14272
Plaintiff:
John Robert Long
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clifton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv03226
Petitioner:
John Robert Clifton
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEMOS v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
as 1:2013cv00013
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS
Respondent:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and US SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
