Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Williams v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01025
Petitioner:
Johnny Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Burnett v. Pettigrew et al
as 5:2022cv00993
Petitioner:
Johnny William Burnett
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00462
Petitioner:
Johnny William Johnson, III
Respondent:
C. Johnson and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyde v. McCarty et al
as 9:2021cv00837
Defendant:
Sergeant L. McCarty, Lisa McCarty, Sergeant Uzunoff and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center, Deputy Wagner, L. McCarty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center, City of Syracuse, Deputy Quigley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. Onondaga Justice Center
as 9:2021cv00748
Defendant:
Onondaga Justice Center
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. Uzunoff
as 9:2021cv00741
Defendant:
Deputy Uzunoff
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. Quigley
as 9:2021cv00742
Defendant:
Quigley
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. City of Syracuse
as 9:2021cv00731
Petitioner:
Johnny William Boyde
Respondent:
City of Syracuse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
