Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kane et al
as 1:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Thomas
Defendant:
Joseph Kane, Daniel Mandell, Jr., Weeden A. Wetmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zappulla v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv01598
Defendant:
Hearing Officer Kenneth Glenn, Correctional Officer Thatcher, Sergeant R. Kane and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Zappulla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kane-Lee v. Warden of Rikers Island
as 1:2020cv01256
Respondent:
Warden of Rikers Island
Petitioner:
Patricia Kane-Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crespo et al v. Inch et al
as 1:2017cv06329
Defendant:
Kimberly Ask-Carlson, Michael Carvajal, Wayne Decker and others
Plaintiff:
David Crespo, Pedro Espada, Jr., Rolfi Espinal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Wise et al v. Quay et al
as 1:2017cv05862
Defendant:
BOP Medical Travis, Captin J. Darden, Lt. S. Kane and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. The City of Poughkeepsie, N.Y. et al
as 1:2016cv10068
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wright
Defendant:
Philip Ratulante, William Badner and Dale Kane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. C.O. Lockman et al
as 2:2016cv02927
Defendant:
C.O Esturo, C.O Kane, C.O Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kane v. NYPD et al
as 1:2014cv08606
Plaintiff:
Nickie Kane
Defendant:
NYPD, New York Police Department and 32nd Precinct
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Toliver v. Fischer et al
as 9:2012cv00077
Plaintiff:
Michel Toliver
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Eric Schneidermann, Joseph T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
