Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Williams v. Richardson
as 1:2024cv00129
Petitioner: Kent Williams
Respondent: Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff: Kent Williams
Defendant: Steve Young, Warden Richardson, SGT. Smyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bamesberger (PS) v. Sells
as 1:2024cv00421
Plaintiff: Kent William Alan Bamesberger, Jr. and Kent William Alan Bamesberger
Defendant: Sells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: Kent Williams
Defendant: Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Kent Williams
Defendant: Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff: Kent Williams
Defendant: Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02276
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bamesburger (PS) v. Markus et al
as 1:2023cv02012
Plaintiff: Kent William Bamesburger and Kent William Alan Bamesberger
Defendant: Markus, Wright, Valdovenos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00786
Petitioner: Roger Kent Williams
Respondent: Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Lawton City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00284
Plaintiff: Kent Williams
Defendant: Lawton City of, James Smith, Terry Sellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?