Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gordon v. Bertsch et al
as 1:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael Gordon
Defendant:
Leann K. Bertsch, Colby Braun, Don Redmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olafson v. Schulz et al
as 3:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Olafson
Defendant:
Ann Schulz, Wanda Bear, Cindy Splee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holbach v. Conmy et al
as 1:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mitchell D. Holbach
Defendant:
Patrick A. Conmy, Ralph R. Erickson, Daniel L. Hovland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Jordheim et al
as 3:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Michael H Hunter
Defendant:
Lynn Jordheim, Richard J Henderson, Jeffrey C. Clapper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siegrist v. United States et al
as 1:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
James Allan Siegrist
Defendant:
United States, Timothy Q. Purdon, David D Hagler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Siegrist v. Kline et al
as 1:2013cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Allan Siegrist
Defendant:
Karen Kline, Charles Miller, Timothy Q. Purdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Bertsch et al
as 1:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Leann Bertsch, Robyn Schmalenberger, Sean Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Cass County Jail Medical Department et al
as 3:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Cass County Jail Medical Department, Ralph Erickson, Daniel Hovland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Bertsch et al
as 1:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Leann K Bertsch, Timothy Schuetzle, Daniel Hovland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hoeven et al
as 3:2008cv00050
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
John Hoeven, Leann K Bertsch, Timothy Schuetzle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
