Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McLaney v. Shaunda et al (REM)
as 3:2018cv00513
Plaintiff:
Jackie W McLaney
Defendant:
Nurse Shaunda, Kenneth Mathews and TBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenlee v. Nurse Shawnda et al
as 3:2018cv00496
Defendant:
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, Glenn Ballenger, Sgt Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Greenlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin Hughes v. Rogersville City Police Depar, et al
as 17-5307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN E. HUGHES
Defendant:
ROGERSVILLE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS and KENNETH MATHEWS, M.D.
Martin Hughes v. Rogersville City Police Dept, et al
as 16-6519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN E. HUGHES
Defendant:
ROGERSVILLE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS and KENNETH MATHEWS, M.D.
Harmon v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
James Howard Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Grainger Williams, Kenneth Mathews and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Clayton
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Tim Ioky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Clayton
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Tim Ioky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yerkey v. Swing et al
as 4:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Howard Yerkey
Defendant:
Austin Swing, Jerry Sircy, Kenneth Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yerkey v. Swing et al
as 4:2015mc00002
Plaintiff:
Howard Yerkey
Defendant:
Austin Swing, Jerry Sircy, Kenneth Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Sedrick Darion Mitchell
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Kenneth Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
