Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Donelson v. Mindi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv03177
Petitioner: Charles Donelson
Respondent: Mindi Nurse
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Defendant: Paul Blackwell, Leonta Jackson, William E Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01318
Petitioner: Charles Hamilton
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and Daniel Clark
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv03240
Plaintiff: Charles W Armour
Defendant: Tracy Cheatham, Daniel Sullivan, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv06042
Plaintiff: Charles W Armour
Defendant: Daniel Sullivan, Illinois Department of Corrections (I.D.O.C.), John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03259
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv06696
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and Kim Smith
Petitioner: Ernest R Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newton v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv03240
Respondent: Illinois Department of Corrections and Kimberly Smith
Undetermined: Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner: Keith B Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanks v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01197
Petitioner: Jay A Hanks
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanks v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv03132
Petitioner: Jay A Hanks
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lamb v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02377
Petitioner: Antoine Lamb
Respondent: Kimberly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?