Cases 1 - 10 of 191
Marrow v. Lawler et al
as 1:2019cv01690
Defendant:
Mrs. Granuland, Rose A. McKinney, Mrs. Susan Wolfe and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Marrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv05563
Plaintiff:
GARY WILSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, SANDRA K. KNEEDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2014cv00401
Petitioner:
DEWAYNE JACKSON
Respondent:
RAYMOND M. LAWLER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dominguez v. Rendell et al
as 1:2013cv02842
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Dominguez
Defendant:
Rendell, Jeffrey Beard, Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shakur v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv02208
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, R. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lennon v. Lawler et al
as 3:2012cv00930
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jason Lennon
Defendant:
R.M. Lawler, C. Green, B. Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roulhac v. Lawler et al
as 1:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Paul Khalifah Roulhac
Defendant:
R. M. Lawler, Mary Lou Showalter, Shoaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carder v. Greene et al
as 1:2011cv01922
Plaintiff:
Marcus Carder
Defendant:
Connie Greene and Raymond Lawler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Beard et al
as 3:2011cv01431
Plaintiff:
Rhonshawn Jackson
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Shirley M. Smeal, Supt. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUEVI v. LAWLER et al
as 2:2011cv00962
Petitioner:
KEVIN RICHARD QUEVI
Respondent:
RAYMOND LAWLER, D.O.C. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI-HUNTINGDON and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
