Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Backslay v. The Collier County Jail
as 1:2023cv11401
Petitioner:
Leonard Backslay
Respondent:
The Collier County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. MCI Concord, Superintendent
as 1:2020cv11317
Petitioner:
Leonard Jermaine Jackson
Respondent:
MCI Concord, Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11609
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ortiz v. Turco et al
as 1:2017cv10102
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ortiz
Defendant:
Thomas Turco, Joseph Murphy, Dean Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moton v. Grondolsky
as 1:2016cv10159
Petitioner:
Leonard Allen Moton
Respondent:
Jeffrey Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Briggs et al v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 1:2015cv40162
Plaintiff:
Leonard Briggs , George Skinder , Louis Markham and others
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Carol Higgins O'Brien, Katherine A. Chmiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Briggs et al v. Massachusetts Department of Correction et al
as 4:2015cv40162
Plaintiff:
Leonard Briggs , George Skinder , Louis Markham and others
Defendant:
Massachusetts Department of Correction, Carol Higgins O'Brien, Katherine A. Chmiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Giroux v. UMass Correctional Health Care et al
as 1:2014cv12695
Plaintiff:
Leonard Giroux
Defendant:
UMass Correctional Health Care, UMass Medical School, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moton v. Grondolsky
as 1:2013cv12397
Petitioner:
Leonard Moton
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Jane Doe et al
as 1:2013cv12040
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jackson
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and James J. Saba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
