Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Leonard v. Walton et al
as 4:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Leonard
Defendant:
Scott Walton, K. Jones, Turn Key Health Clinics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leonard v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Don D Leonard
Respondent:
Scott Crow and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawson v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00762
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Charles Leonard Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Quallate v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv00844
Plaintiff:
Leonard Quallate
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Tracy McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Etheridge v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00712
Movant:
Leonard D Etheridge
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Green v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Rickke L Green
Defendant:
Dan Reynolds, Robert Patton, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rackley v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2014cv00721
Petitioner:
Leonard Carmen Rackley
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of, Jerry Chrisman and Scott Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rackley v. Blevins et al
as 5:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Leonard Carmen Rackley
Defendant:
Johnny Blevins, Justin Jones, Tim Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv01273
Plaintiff:
Leonard Davis
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones and Mary Fallin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knox v. Scott et al
as 6:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
Wade Scott, OSP Food Service Mgr., Valerie Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
