Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Berry v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Honorable Judge Edmonds and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Wallace et al
as 6:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leonard Berry
Defendant:
Wallace, Dirkson, Garibay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carleton v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01764
Petitioner:
Leonard George Carleton
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Leonard v. Benavidez et al
as 6:2021cv01071
Plaintiff:
Stanley Leonard
Defendant:
Ruben Benavidez, Darren Rom, Naumann Nawaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper-Leonard v. Washburn
as 2:2021cv00539
Respondent:
Sue Washburn
Petitioner:
Jacob Harper-Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sandoval v. Cain
as 2:2019cv01278
Petitioner:
Leonard Contreras Sandoval
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leonard v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00893
Defendant:
Lt. Archer, Steve Bruce, Dave Pedro and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn E. Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01695
Defendant:
Rick Coursey, Michael Gower, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollinquest v. Payne
as 2:2017cv01423
Defendant:
Jason Bell, Steve Franke, J. Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Dasay Hollinquest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berestoff v. Amos et al
as 3:2017cv00077
Defendant:
Russell Amos, Clackamas County Circuit Court, Clackamas County District Attorneys Office and others
Plaintiff:
James Maxwell Worthington Berestoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
