Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Butler et al v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pernell Butler
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Timothy Ward, Ahmed Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BULLOCK v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN LUMPKIN, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BULLOCK v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BULLOCK
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN LUMPKIN, UNIT MANAGER SANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WARDEN BERRY WALTER, DEPUTY ERIC MARTIN, CHIEF CONSELOR WHIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN ERIC MARTIN, CHIEF COUNSELOR PRETRILLION WHIPPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WILLAMSON et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADDARRYL JONES and TUPAC DAVID SHAKUR
Defendant:
TERRANCE DENNIS, KELSIE WILLIAMSON, WARDEN BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. Lumpkin Co.
as 2:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
Anthony Glenn Newell
Defendant:
Lumpkin Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTBROOKS v. BERRY et al
as 5:2021cv00192
Defendant:
MARTIN ERIC, BALDWIN STATE PRISON, WARDEN LAWRENCE EASELEY and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER WESTBROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunch v. Lumpkin County Detention Center
as 2:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Lumpkin County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Edgar Lamont Bunch, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORMIER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00486
Plaintiff:
JOHN CORMIER
Defendant:
CHIEF COUNSELOR PRETRILLION WHIPPLE, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, TRACY LUMPKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
