Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Manning v. Kaufman Constables Office et al
as 3:2023cv02064
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Manning
Defendant:
Kaufman Constables Office, Calloway County Sheriff's Office, Medical City Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Dallas Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2022cv02260
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy Chaney
Defendant:
Dallas Sheriff Office, Lancaster PD and Wayne McCollum Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Lancaster et al
as 7:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Shannon Day
Defendant:
Monica Lancaster, Jerry Cook, Matthew Nicholas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lancaster v. USA
as 2:2021cv00258
Petitioner:
William Robert Lancaster
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Woods v. City of Lancaster Texas et al
as 3:2021cv03027
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamar Woods
Defendant:
City of Lancaster Texas, Lancaster Police Department, R Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v.Bedford Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv03028
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamar Woods
Defendant:
Bedford Police Department, City of Bedford Texas, City of Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lancaster v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
Cyrus H Lancaster
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andres v. Lancaster Police Department
as 3:2015cv03581
Plaintiff:
Edward L Andres
Defendant:
Lancaster Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. Alvarez et al
as 5:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Colton Lee Lancaster
Respondent:
Jorge Alvarez and Lt. Obregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. United States Of America
as 6:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Lancaster
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
