Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Whittenberg v. Bureau of Prisons Western Regional Office et al
as 5:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Lane Whittenberg
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Western Regional Office, Dennis M. Wong and USP Victorville Property Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ramsey v. Lane et al
as 2:2023cv02174
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Ramsey
Defendant:
A. Lane, C. MaHenski, A. Yderraga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Whittenberg v. Ayala et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Lane Kelly Whittenberg
Defendant:
Jose Tovar Ayala and Philip Blackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broque Anthony Anderson v. Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2021cv02170
Plaintiff:
Broque Anthony Anderson
Defendant:
Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff Department, Sheriff Deputy J. Lane and Sheriff Deputy J. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Castrejon Venegas v. Honea et al
as 2:2021cv02197
Plaintiff:
Carlos Angel Castrejon Venegas
Defendant:
Kory Lane Honea, Kimberly Merrifield, Brad J. Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Ponce v. Lane et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Plaintiff:
Pablo Jesus Ponce
Defendant:
Leo, Freedom-through-Education, Marvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
(PC) Gray v. C. Flores et al
as 1:2020cv00902
Defendant:
M. Franco, C. Flores, L Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Oliver Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bland v. Jennings et al
as 2:2020cv01165
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, M. Brown, J. Madsen and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver Gray v. C. Flores et al
as 2:2020cv03552
Defendant:
M. Franco, L. Lane, C. Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Oliver Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
