Cases 1 - 10 of 152
JOHNSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOSHUA TERRA, CO1 ALEX, CO2 PISTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. GREENE et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Plaintiff:
LEONARD YOUNG
Defendant:
SGT GREENE, C.O. LANE, COUNSELOR J MUPRHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. Seilus
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
CARL LANE
Defendant:
Joseph Seilus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
IN RE: CARLTON LANE
as 2:2022cv01812
Petitioner:
CARLTON LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LANE v. MASON et al
as 5:2021cv03780
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LANE
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lane v. Hartman et al
as 3:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Barry Karwowski, Harold Kertes, John Battenberg and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JORDAN-BEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2020cv03608
Defendant:
RACHEL ECHMENDIA D/B/A DEFENSE ATTORNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, TIMIKA LANE D/B/A COMMON PLEAS JUDGE OF PENNSYLVANIA PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
SHARIF JORDAN-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKSON v. Lane et al
as 2:2020cv02368
Defendant:
Lieutenant M. Lane, Correctional Officer Anthony, Correctional Officer Camona and others
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC DICKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RA-BEY v. LANE et al
as 2:2020cv00648
Defendant:
TIMIKA LANE and EARL D. RAYNOR, JR.
Plaintiff:
TETI AMUN RA-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2019cv06108
Defendant:
K. WADAS, COMMONWEALTH OF PHILADELPHIA, L. MANDELL and others
Plaintiff:
SHAQUOR WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
