Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harrington v. White et al
as 8:2022cv02633
Defendant:
Brooke P. Boldin, Thomas White, Jim Kane and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Lee Harrington, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vails v. Cribbs et al
as 9:2022cv80945
Plaintiff:
Taparrish Vails
Defendant:
Lt Cribbs, Sgt Williams, Officer Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Vails v. Williams et al
as 9:2022cv80939
Plaintiff:
Taparrish Vails
Defendant:
Williams, Cribbs, Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. Dawsy et al
as 5:2015cv00348
Plaintiff:
Nestor Rivera Rojas
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Dawsy, Dodi Pruitt, Jeremy Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laughlin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv00032
Petitioner:
Jason Laughlin
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laughlin v. The Florida Bar et al
as 6:2013cv00315
Plaintiff:
Jason Laughlin
Defendant:
The Florida Bar, Lawson Ledran Lamar and Daniel D. Mazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laughlin v. Burgess et al
as 5:2008cv00315
Plaintiff:
James D. Laughlin
Defendant:
C. Burgess, FNU Catalano, FNU Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LAUGHLIN v. MCNEIL
as 1:2008cv00111
Petitioner:
JAMES D LAUGHLIN
Respondent:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laughlin v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 5:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
James D. Laughlin
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RICHARDSON v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00166
Plaintiff:
LARRY DONNELL RICHARDSON
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH, JOHNSON, ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
