Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Garland v. Nail
as 1:2023cv05784
Petitioner:
Lemone Garland
Respondent:
Reginald Scandrett and Michael W. Nail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv04301
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson, Inmates of Clayton County Jail, Christopher Troy Gather and others
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Sheriff's Office and Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Sandford et al
as 1:2022cv02218
Plaintiff:
Stevie Porter
Defendant:
Dr. Kenneth Sandford and Dr. Rhonda Lemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Williamson et al
as 3:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Mr. Horne, Cpt. Faison, Ms. Harold and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSH v. FOSTER et al
as 5:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
EWELL RANDOLPH BUSH, JR
Defendant:
FOSTER, LEMON, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowrey v. Chapman et al
as 3:2015cv00025
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BLAKE LOWREY
Respondent:
JOE CHAPMAN, HARRIS, SAMUEL OZBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowrey v. Chapman et al
as 1:2015cv00627
Petitioner:
Anthony Blake Lowrey
Respondent:
Joel Chapman, Harris, Samuel Ozburn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
