Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Floyd v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00356
Defendant:
Jeffrey Dillman, P. Sykes, Happy Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Leroy Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Demetric Markie Venable
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Virginia, Honorable S. Bernard Goodwyn, Honorable D. Arthur Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Poole et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Leroy Poole
Defendant:
Jennifer Poole, Cameron E. Green and Office of the Williamsburg Commonwealth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Poole et al
as 7:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Leroy Poole
Defendant:
Jennifer Poole, Cameron E. Green and Office of the Williamsburg Commonwealth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Clarke
as 7:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Edward Leroy Marshall
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cain v. Chapman et al
as 3:2021cv00566
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dexter Cain
Defendant:
Tonya Chapman and A. David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Clark et al
as 7:2021cv00434
Plaintiff:
Alvin Leroy West
Defendant:
Harold W. Clark, Mr. Newton, Supt. Middle River Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coaxum v. Ray
as 7:2021cv00305
Petitioner:
Cleveland Leroy Coaxum, Jr.
Respondent:
Tracy Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Halter et al v. Middle River Regional Jail Authorities et al
as 7:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Scott McCray, Michael Summers, Leroy Benton and others
Defendant:
City of Waynesboro, Rockingham County, Superintendent Jeffrey Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
