Cases 1 - 10 of 469
Singleton v. Leposky et al
as 3:2024cv01543
Plaintiff:
John U. Singleton
Defendant:
G. Leposky, Lightfoot, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv04801
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steffan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Lewis v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Agualar Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Deandre Davis
Defendant:
C/O Baker, Christopher Kern, Matthew Dulaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anaya v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01080
Plaintiff:
Martin Anaya
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, K. Bennett, . Smythe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lewis v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Kyle Bernard Lewis
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Davis
Defendant:
. Baker, Christopher Kern, Matthew Dulaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Shack et al
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Nirin Walls
Defendant:
Tawanda Shack, Butler, Grayson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Heaton et al
as 2:2023cv02259
Plaintiff:
David Blake Lewis
Defendant:
. Heaton, Pat Hartshorn, . Shelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Dixon Correctional Medical Staff et al
as 3:2023cv50294
Plaintiff:
Clarence Richard Lewis
Defendant:
Dixon Correctional Medical Staff, Doctor Sy, Monica Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
