Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Turoczi et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jason Turoczi, Chad Weed, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Scott Sempel, Edward Maldonado, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Early v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Wayne Early
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Christopher Brunelle, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01064
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. USA
as 3:2023cv00613
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lewis v. Connecticut Commissioner of Correction
as 3:2023cv00492
Petitioner:
Kacey Lewis
Respondent:
Connecticut Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scott Erfe, WIlliam Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Stango et al
as 3:2022cv01248
Plaintiff:
Roderick Lewis
Defendant:
Charles Stango, Corneilius Kelly, Frank Iannotti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verity v. Hargreaves et al
as 3:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Michael Verity
Defendant:
Jonathan Hargreaves, Mahboob Ashraf, Juanita Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calix v. Pullen et al
as 3:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Andre Calix
Defendant:
T. Pullen, Geib, Blackman - Conston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boone v. Papoosha et al
as 3:2021cv00697
Defendant:
D. Papoosha, Payne, A. Santiago and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Boone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
