Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Mains v. Masterson et al
as 4:2017cv00633
Plaintiff:
Marvin Leroy Mains
Defendant:
Chad Masterson, John Clarke, Russell Earls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naiym Talib v. Linda Kearson, et al
as 15-14236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NAIYM SHAHAAB TALIB, a.k.a. Lonnie James Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA KELLY KEARSON, General Counsel, HARVEY RUVIN, Clerk, JOEL H. BROWN and others
Talib v. Kearson et al
as 1:2015cv20209
Plaintiff:
Naiym Shahaab Talib
Defendant:
Linda Kelly Kearson, Harvey Ruvin, Joel H. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDONALD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv06710
Petitioner:
MAURICE MCDONALD
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2013cv01466
Petitioner:
DAVID D. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, JOHN E. WETZEL and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOGAN v. MOONEY et al
as 1:2013cv02402
Petitioner:
ERIC ROMONT HOGAN
Respondent:
Mooney, STEFANIE J. SALAVANTIS and Linda Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANTANA v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2013cv05407
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL OCASIO SANTANA
Respondent:
JOHN THOMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOGAN v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2013cv04062
Petitioner:
ERIC ROMONT HOGAN
Respondent:
MOONEY, STEFANIE J. SALAVANTIS and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TORRES v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv03334
Petitioner:
RAFAEL TORRES
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANVILLE v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2013cv02208
Petitioner:
FAHMEE GRANVILLE
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
