Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01522
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Logan v. Howarter
as 1:2024cv01201
Plaintiff:
Drew Logan
Defendant:
Justin Howarter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seger v. Department of Human Services
as 3:2024cv01368
Petitioner:
Logan S Seger
Respondent:
State of Illinois Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Logan v. Roberson et al
as 1:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Drew Logan
Defendant:
J.D Roberson, D.R Clark, LeAnn Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petrov v. Graves et al
as 3:2024cv03114
Plaintiff:
Mila Petrov
Defendant:
. Graves and Logan Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seger v. People of the State et al
as 3:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Logan S. Seger
Respondent:
People of the State, Department of Human Services and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. Carlson
as 3:2024cv50153
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Judy Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
Brittany Valencia Martin
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus, Melinda Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv50144
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Attorney General and McHenry County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
