Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Raney v. Goehl et al
as 2:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Adam Raney
Defendant:
Officer Goehl, Officer Wodak, Ashley Haseleu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hewlett v. Thomsen et al
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Damien Shontell Hewlett
Defendant:
Justin L Thomsen, Brandon Fischer, Tanner Leopole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Benzol et al
as 2:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Karl O Logan, Jr
Defendant:
Jason D Benzol, Warden, Brian J Greff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scharon v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 1:2021cv00895
Plaintiff:
Roberto J Scharon
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Milwaukee County, Sgt Thomas Livesey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wand, Armin v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2019cv00927
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Logan Brown, Mark Kartman and others
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Armin Wand, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright, John v. Glaum, Eric et al
as 3:2017cv00679
Plaintiff:
John F. Wright, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Glaum, Ismael Ozanne, Chelsea Wetjen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zach, Thomas v. Beahm, Brian et al
as 3:2016cv00823
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Zach
Defendant:
Brian Beahm , Brian Green, Troy Hermans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golden v. Fullmer et al
as 2:2016cv01162
Plaintiff:
Parish M Golden
Defendant:
Luke Fullmer , Larry Dillenberg, Benjamin Giffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant, James v. Schaefer, Trenton et al
as 3:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
Trenton Schaefer, Greg Shondrell, Criag Vandermolen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOGAN, JAMES D. v. USA
as 3:2008cv00213
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JAMES D. LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
